Tag Archive: United States


Shira’s note:  As much as I respect and regard Ms. Glick’s perspective on everything she expounds upon, it is always a lengthy read.  With that, it’s worth it. Unfortunately, with us, our time is so limited with everything else, we don’t give ourselves enough time to practice polemics in educating ourselves and others; whereas, personalities such as Ms. Glick makes this, their perspectives finely tuned and wise with as much truth that can be warranted to be read on a daily basis.  It’s my wish that we can take the time to discuss the global issues prevalent today to make a difference micro-globally, to somehow damage ignorance-based hatred and find justice where it is usually hidden and takes too much to find. This is a wish. Let me know if you relate to what I’m saying, and if so, share this blog so others can relate.  Thanks…S.

On Tuesday, Egypt’s chief prosecutor issued arrest warrants against eight US citizens.  Their purported crimes relate either to their reported involvement in the production of the Internet movie critical of Islam that has received so much attention over the past 10 days, or to other alleged anti-Islamic activities. One of the US citizens indicted is a woman who converted from Islam to Christianity. According to the Associated Press, Egypt’s general prosecution issued a statement announcing that the eight US citizens have been indicted on charges of insulting and publicly attacking Islam, spreading false information, and harming Egyptian national unity.  The statement stipulated that they could face the death penalty if convicted. The AP write-up of the story quoted Mamdouh Ismail, a Salafi attorney who praised the prosecution’s move. He claimed it would deter others from exercising their right to free expression in regards to Islam. As he put it, the prosecutions will “set a deterrent for them and anyone else who may fall into this.” That is, they will deter others from saying anything critical about Islam. This desire to intimidate free people into silence on Islam is clearly the goal the heads of the Muslim Brotherhood seek to achieve through their protests of the anti-Islamic movie. This was the message of Muslim Brotherhood chief Yussuf Qaradawi. Three days after the anti-American assaults began on the anniversary of the September 11 jihadist attacks on America, Qaradawi gave a sermon on Qatar television, translated by MEMRI.

Qaradawi struck a moderate tone. He called on his followers to stop rioting against the US. Rather than attack the US, Qaradawi urged his Muslim audience to insist that the US place prohibitions on the free speech rights of American citizens by outlawing criticism of Islam – just as the Europeans have done in recent years in the face of Islamic terror and intimidation.

In his words, “We say to the US: You must take a strong stance and try to confront this extremism like the Europeans do. This [anti-Islamic film] is not art. It has nothing to do with freedom of speech. This is nothing but curses and insults. Does the freedom to curse and insult constitute freedom of speech?”

Both the actions of the Egyptian prosecution and Qaradawi’s sermon prove incontrovertibly that the two policies the US has adopted since September 11, 2001, to contend with Muslim hatred for the US have failed. The neoconservative policy of supporting the democratization of Muslim societies adopted by President Barack Obama’s predecessor George W. Bush has failed. And the appeasement policy adopted by Obama has also failed. Bush’s democratization policy claimed that the reason the Muslim world had become a hotbed for anti-Americanism and terror was that the Muslim world was not governed by democratic regimes. Once the peoples of the Muslim world were allowed to be free, and to freely elect their governments, the neoconservatives proclaimed, they would abandon their hatred of America. As a consequence of this belief, when the anti-regime protests against the authoritarian Mubarak regime began in January 2011, the neoconservatives were outspoken supporters of the overthrow of then-president Hosni Mubarak, despite the fact that he had been the US’s key ally in the Arab world for three decades. They supported the political process that brought the Muslim Brotherhood to power. They supported the process despite the fact that Qaradawi is the most influential cleric in Egypt. They supported it despite the fact that just days after Mubarak was ousted from power, Qaradawi arrived at Cairo’s Tahrir Square and before an audience of two million followers, he called for the invasion of Israel and the conquest of Jerusalem. In the event, the Egyptian people voted for Qaradawi’s Muslim Brotherhood and for the Salafi party. The distinction between the two parties is that Qaradawi and the Muslim Brotherhood are willing to resort to both violent and nonviolent ways to dominate the world in the name of Islam. The Salafis abjure nonviolence. So while Qaradawi called for the riots to end in order to convince the Americans to criminalize criticism of Islam, his Salafi counterparts called for the murder of everyone involved in producing the anti-Islamic film. For instance, Salafi cleric Ahmad Fouad Ashoush issued a fatwa on Islamic websites last weekend calling for American and European Muslims to murder those involved with the movie. His religious ruling was translated by the SITE Intelligence Group on Monday. Ashoush wrote, “Those bastards who did this film are belligerent disbelievers. I issue a fatwa and call on the Muslim youth in America and Europe to do this duty, which is to kill the director, the producer and the actors and everyone who helped and promoted the film. “So, hurry, hurry, O Muslim youth in America and Europe, and teach those filthy lowly ones a lesson that all the monkeys and pigs in America and Europe will understand. May Allah guide you and grant you success.”

These are the voices of democratic Egypt. The government, which has indicted American citizens on capital charges for exercising their most fundamental right as Americans, is a loyal representative of the sentiments of the Egyptian people who freely elected it. The Salafi preacher is a loyal representative of the segment of the Egyptian people that made the Salafi party the second largest in the Egyptian parliament. Qaradawi’s call for the abolition of freedom of speech in America – as has happened in Europe – and to ban all criticism of Islam is subscribed to by millions and millions of Muslims worldwide who consider him one of the leading Sunni clerics in the world. Free elections in Egypt have empowered the Egyptian people to use the organs of governance to advance their hatred of America. Their hatred has been empowered, and legitimized, not diminished as the neoconservatives had hoped. The behavior of the Egyptian government, Qaradawi and the Salafis also makes clear that Obama’s policy of appeasing the Muslim world has failed completely. Whereas Bush believed the source of Muslim hatred was their political oppression at the hands of their regimes, Obama has blamed their rage and hatred on America’s supposed misdeeds. By changing the way America treats the Muslim world, Obama believes he can end their hatred of America. To this end, he has reached out to the most anti-American forces and regimes in the region and spurned pro-American regimes and political forces.

When Obama’s policies are recognized as driven by appeasement, the seeming inconsistency of his war against Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi on the one hand, and his passivity in the face of the anti-regime uprising in Iran in 2009 and the Syrian uprising against the Assad regime today makes sense. Gaddafi was not a threat to the US, so he was unworthy of protection. The mullahs in Iran and Assad are foes of the US. So they deserve protection. Obama has assiduously courted the Muslim Brotherhood from the outset of his presidency. The official and unofficial Egyptian exploitation of the Internet film as a means to intimidate and attack the US into disavowing its core principles is proof that Obama’s theory of the source of Muslim rage is wrong. They do not hate America because of what the US government does. They hate America because of what America is. And it is because of this that since September 11, the rationale for Obama’s foreign policy has disintegrated. Rather than accept this basic truth and defend the American way of life, Obama has doubled down in the only way now available to him. He, his administration, his campaign and his supporters in the media have responded to the collapse of the foundations of his foreign policy by resorting to the sort of actions they accused George W. Bush, his administration and supporters of taking. They have responded with a campaign of political oppression and nativist bigotry directed against their political opponents.

Late last Friday night, law enforcement officers descended on the California home of Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, the man who made the film that the Muslims of the newly free Arab lands find so offensive. Nakoula was questioned by federal authorities and later released. His arrest was photographed. The image of a dozen officers arresting an unarmed man for making a movie was broadcast worldwide within moments. Beyond persecuting an independent filmmaker, the White House requested that YouTube block access to it. YouTube – owned by Google – has so far rejected the White House’s request. The Obama administration’s abetment of bigoted nativism to silence criticism of its substantively indefensible foreign policy was on prominent display last Sunday. Obama’s campaign endorsed an anti-Semitic screed published by New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd.

In her column, titled, “Neocons slither back,” Dowd wrote that Republican Presidential and Vice Presidential nominees Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan are mere puppets controlled by “neocon puppet master, Dan Senor.” Neocon is a popular code for Jewish. It was so identified by Dowd’s Times’ colleague David Brooks several years ago. Dowd said that “the neocons captured” Bush after the September 11 attacks and “Now, amid contagious Arab rage sparked on the 11th anniversary of 9/11, they have captured another would-be Republican president and vice president, both jejeune about the world.” One telling aspect of Dowd’s assault on Senor as a neoconservative is that he and his boss in the Bush administration, Paul Bremer, were the nemeses of the neoconservatives at the Pentagon. The only thing Senor has in common with the likes of Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith is that all three men are Jews. Moreover, Dowd drew a distinction between supposed “neocons” like Senor, and non-Jewish US leaders Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney who merely “abetted” the neocons. So Senor doesn’t share the same ideological worldview as Feith and Wolfowitz but he’s a neocon. And Cheney and Rumseld do share the same worldview as Feith and Wolfowitz. And they are not neocons.

The Times’ public editor Andrew Rosenthal dismissed claims that Dowd’s column was anti- Semitic, arguing it couldn’t be since she never said a word about Jews. The Obama campaign linked to Dowd’s column on its Twitter account with the message, “Why Romney and Ryan’s foreign policy sounds ‘ominously familiar.'” Obama’s campaign’s willingness to direct the public to anti-Semitic screeds against his political opponents is consistent with the administration’s general strategy for defending policies. That strategy involves responding to criticism not with substantive defense of his policies, but with ad hominem attacks against his critics. His failed economic policies’ critics are attacked as “Wall Street fat cats.” His failed foreign policies’ critics are demonized as ominous neocon puppet masters. There is a difference between appeasing parties that have been harmed by your actions and appeasing parties that wish your destruction. In the 1970s the US appeased the Philippines by transferring sovereignty over the Clark Air Force Base to the Philippine government. America was still America and the US and the Philippines became friends.

 

Advertisements
A time chart of oil depletion at each oil prod...

Image via Wikipedia

An article on challenging your assumptions

By Shira Loustaunau

08/06/2011.

Insights and perspectives of the movie, “What a Way to Go” by VisionQuest Pictures, parts 1 through 8.

For those of us that are more inclined and seek a better way to confront our environmental, cultural, and the overall global demise, this article will be easy to be read. For those of us that cannot confront the reality of doom and gloom on planet earth, which is the path we have made for ourselves, you can stop reading now.  But this is not what I want. This is not what the producers and directors of this movie want.  What we want is for us to face what our reality is in confronting peak oil, climate change, mass extinction, and population overshoot.

Most of what we do know of these issues is that it is not enough.  The more we choose not to watch, stay ignorant by choice, not know what others are experiencing through greenhouse gases, temperatures on the rise, more floods, more droughts, hunger, rising sea levels, and the facts that what we ignore will be our undoing, if we do not address the issues today.  In fact, some might say it could be too late.  It is redundant to say that we are in peril now, and in the future, and in the future of our children.  The very survival of our species is now in question.  The planet  is closer now to an ecological meltdown than it has ever been.

How has this all played out?  How do we get to the point that we are at right now?  How do we begin and continue to start a dialogue to address the issues?  What we do is start off with the facts and in so many words, educate ourselves in “how did we get here?” Briefly, we have built a totalitarian agriculture; we have population overgrowth, hard work and poor health, wealth and inequity, expansion and war.  Is it a fact that our dependence on agriculture is the fundamental cause of the so many problems as stated above.  We have environmental destruction and “the rise of Empire” through city and cultures in order to equate and sustain our needs for the overpopulation we have today.  The human ecosystem that we built cannot be sustained once the importation of resources cannot be delivered to these places, which means trade, which requires transport, and transport requires energy, meaning oil, and energy has to come from somewhere.

So, let’s see, we have a totalitarian agricultural society with whom need to be fed and have water to drink, combined with our dependence on fossil fuel from other countries, which are, by the way, depleting at what the scientific community would phrase “peak oil” in general terms, and from here, it goes down. If we have our resources at peak levels for the first time in history, and it is declining, what comes next? War. No one should be shocked by that. In order for us, the Western World to live, without mentioning other countries around the world, what we have left is the war for energy.  “We have a food race on our hands.” Not only are we warring with ourselves as humans, we are destroying the very thing we need to live. We have accumulated wealth at the expense of our environment.  We have created the greenhouse effect which is destroying our land and our oceans.  Don’t you think Nature would fight back? The population of our species is going to be reduced. There are forces at work, either by disease, natural catastrophes, climate change, and oil depletion that will in fact play out more so than what we have seen or lived through.  “We are in the midst of an ecological meltdown.”

Can we talk about this earnestly and clearly? Can we control the population?  We cannot survive apart from the earth, yet we are killing her. We feel deep grief of this loss of connection. Our job now is to wake up and start talking to everyone that would listen, arm ourselves instead of with guns but with knowledge and get rid of the old thinking of materialistic pleasures in which we have met that “peak” and must now change.

Author’s note: I will continue with parts 9 through 12 anon. Hopefully, there will be more answers than doom and gloom. Reality bites…

Every morning I read the news. At this time in our lives, it is unbelievable the accelerated hate and greed, and abuses of human life, not to mention mass murders, natural disasters, etc., occurring right now.  There is just not enough time to list the many horrible things that are happening to us.  It is frightening, and yet here I am safe at home free to do as I please. In point, make no mistake, our lives could change for the worse at any moment if they haven’t already.  I think a part of us as the whole of humanity, the macrocosm of the soul, is suffering with those who are so far away in another land, another place; that is, for those of us that are filled with love and not hate.  The more we stay silent on these issues, the more hate and evil will win.  Our earth is in pain, as a whole, and we need more strength to help her help us.

When I’m reading about the Israeli/Palestinian struggle, I read everyday of the strife the Muslims go through.  I understand their plight and how they wish for freedom, and sometimes I think they need freedom from their own hate, and the only they see it, is getting rid of Israel.  When I look at pictures from the media, I see anger and hate in a way I’ve never seen before. The crowds of men, so many men, yelling and shooting guns, and with the vitriol and disgust they see in the world, it is truly and profoundly sad.  What makes it worse, is that even we as Americans that want to be tolerant and understanding to their plight, they could care less.  It is just another way for them to blame Israel for sympathizing with them and for them.

The lack of balance and understanding between the conflict is overwhelmingly seen in our ignorance on both issues.  That being said, the only thing that I could do is read for justice, find the truth, have faith and somehow educate myself better so that I can make a difference.  So, the real reason I am writing this today is that in sitting safely in my little office, drinking tea, reading, working, living freely, I found the only thing I could to right now is to shift the balance and move it in a way so that we can make changes.

How? Let’s do this: Ask yourself ‘why are so many men in the Middle East full of hate, waging war, live in squalor, do not have enough food, etc., etc.?’ Because they are not educated.  They don’t have education systems to be able to enhance their environment, to grow their own food, to start a business, to become a judge, and on and on.  What they have, and this is not pleasant, is that they raise their children to be able to make war, hate more and yes, through beheading their livestock, they inculcate the beheading of westerners.  The second question: ‘Where are the women?’ Educated persons know that answer already.  In this short (at least I think it’s short) blog, I can only share with you what I visualize for these souls in all parties involved, and that is seeing them educated.  Yep, that’s all I can do from behind this desk of mine, but I also have faith in being able to shift polarities, to make change, so yes, I do believe in the butterfly theory.  I know that is naive, but it’s sometimes the simple, innocent faith and love that will make it happen.  That’s not my ego speaking, it’s just a another way to manifest my point in my heart to reach out to others.  Visualize schools, agricultural communities where it’s all green, an Arab society where they are truly living a life without hate, where the women are not afraid to have their voice heard, and the children are not holding rifles.  This will and can happen.

With that, I move on in my day, ever thankful for my freedoms and thankful for my faith and being able to express myself and love for life through this medium.  Anybody out there have any other suggestions?

It’s hard for me to understand why things happen the way they do.  I wish I could bring more to the issues that rock our world than just an opinion, but nothing really makes sense anymore.  We are a world of hypocrites and we’re not growing any wiser with the amount of blame that’s going on.  The death of 6 people in Arizona is horrendous; nobody should be blaming anybody; yet, there it is and it’s causing more hate.  We are all to blame.  We all have blood on our hands, and what do you think is going to happen? Nothing but more hate and blame. My heart goes out to all of the families and friends to those who passed.  My heart goes out to the little girl who died violently, and her innocence is what I mourn.  We need to stop listening or watching the news and start talking and start taking action with ourselves. We need a voice and for me, it shouldn’t be the news companies…all of them.  I pray for peace and I pray we could come together and stop the hate.